Skip to main content

Table 2 Rankings and relative support for local-habitat models that quantify pika occurrence

From: Microrefuges and the occurrence of thermal specialists: implications for wildlife persistence amidst changing temperatures

Model

K

AICc

Δ AICc

W j

E j

Cos(Aspect)

2

197.26

0.00

0.63

n/a

Slope + Elevation + Cos(Aspect)

4

199.29

2.03

0.23

2.74

Slope + Elevation + Cos(Aspect) + Forage

5

201.42

4.16

0.08

7.88

Slope

2

204.06

6.80

0.02

31.50

Global model

7

204.56

7.30

0.02

31.50

Elevation

2

205.98

8.71

0.01

63.00

Forage

2

206.23

8.97

0.01

63.00

Elevation (quadratic)

3

207.52

10.26

0.00

undefined

Elevation x Forage

4

209.12

11.85

0.00

undefined

  1. Model-selection parameters from competing models used to explain the effects of local-habitat parameters on American pika (Ochotona princeps) occurrence in western Wyoming, USA, June – October, 2010 – 2012; K, number of parameters in the model; AICc, Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small samples; Δ AICc, difference for model relative to the smallest AICc in the model set; W j, Akaike weight is the approximate probability in favor of the given model from the set of models considered; E j represents the weight of evidence in support of a model, compared to the top ranked model (W jTop/W ji)