Skip to main content

Table 1 Bayesian assessment of migration rates among Central Sierra sites, derived by BayesAss

From: Climate change refugia and habitat connectivity promote species persistence

  

Source Population

  

DL

ML

CL

VC

FL

LC

SaL

LLC

MLCP

SiL

AM

Sampled Population

Dorothy Lake (DL)

0.69

  

0.08

0.03

 

0.04

0.03

   

May Lake (ML)

 

0.68

  

0.15

    

0.03

 

Cathedral Lake (CL)

  

0.69

 

0.11

      

Virginia Canyon (VC)

   

0.72

0.04

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.04

  

Fletcher Lake (FL)

    

0.77

0.04

   

0.09

 

Lyell Canyon (LC)

    

0.05

0.78

   

0.05

 

Saddlebag Lake (SaL)

    

0.13

0.03

0.69

  

0.03

 

Lundy Lake Campground (LLC)

    

0.06

  

0.78

 

0.04

 

Mono Lake County Park (MLCP)

        

0.89

  

Silver Lake (SiL)

         

0.84

 

Agnew Meadow (AM)

   

0.03

 

0.11

    

0.69

  1. Values represent proportion of migrants per generation from the source population (column heading) to the sampled populations (row headings). Italicized values along the diagonal represent the proportion of non-migrants. Empty cells indicate migration rates lower than 0.03. Human modified sites (in bold) have some of the lowest rates of immigration
Back to article page

Climate Change Responses

ISSN: 2053-7565